Column name |
Unit |
Description |
Instrument |
Method |
Reference |
Pond_No |
- |
pond/kettle hole numbers |
- |
- |
- |
Date |
yyyy-mm-dd |
Sampling date |
- |
- |
- |
Location |
- |
Locality in proximity to the kettle hole |
- |
- |
- |
Sample_No |
- |
Unique identifier of samples |
- |
- |
- |
Zone |
- |
Sampled zone of the kettle
hole |
literature |
- |
Pätzig, M.; Kalettka, T.; Glemnitz, M. & Berger,
G.(2012): What governs macrophyte species richness in
kettle hole types? A case study from Northeast Germany.
Limnologica 42(4), 340-354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2012.07.004 |
Species |
- |
Name of the plant species |
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
Rothmaler, W. (idea), Jäger, E.J., Werner, K. (Editor), 2005. Exkursionflora von Deutschland 4: Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band, 10. Auflage, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, München. |
PlantStand |
- |
Type of plant stand separating between single species and
mixed stands |
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
- |
FurtherSpecies |
- |
Further species found in the plot in case of mixed stands |
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
Rothmaler, W. (idea), Jäger, E.J., Werner, K. (Editor), 2005. Exkursionflora von Deutschland 4: Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band, 10. Auflage, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, München. |
No_FurtherSpecies |
- |
Number of further species found in the plot |
- |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
- |
Cover_Total |
% |
Sum of columns Cover_TargetSpecies and Cover_FurtherSpecies |
- |
calculation |
- |
Cover_TargetSpecies |
% |
Percent cover values for target species in 15-part LONDO
Scale |
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
Londo, G.
(1976) The Decimal Scale for Releves of Permanent Quadrats. Vegetatio 33(1): 61-64.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055300 |
Cover_FurtherSpecies |
% |
Percent cover values for further species in 15-part LONDO
Scale |
see above |
see above |
see above |
No_PlantID |
- |
All culms of the target species counted.
The total number of culms are defined as the total number of plant individuals.
|
- |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
- |
No_LivingLeaves |
- |
10 individuals (if available) of the target species were selected,
stored in separate bags and brought to the laboratory on the same day.
All living leaves of the selected individuals were counted.
Leaves were classified as living if at least 50 % of one leaf was green and present.
If more than 50 % were devoured by herbivores it was classified as dead.
|
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
Daoust, R. J. & D. L. Childers (1998) Quantifying aboveground biomass and
estimating net aboveground primary production for wetland macrophytes using
a non-destructive phenometric technique. Aquatic Botany 62(2):115-133
doi:10.1016/S0304-3770(98)00078-3. |
No_DeadLeaves |
- |
10 individuals (if available) of the target species were selected,
stored in separate bags and brought to the laboratory on the same day.
All dead leaves of the selected individuals were counted.
Leaves were classified as dead if one leaf was less than 50 % green or not present.
If more then 50 % were devoured by herbivores it was classified as dead.
|
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
see above |
LeafLength |
cm |
10 individuals (if available) of the target species were
selected, stored in separate bags and brought to the
laboratory on the same day. Length of the leaves was measured
in the laboratory with centimeter precision by flattening the
probes on graph paper. In C. riparia and P. arundinacea, leaf
length was defined as the distance from leaf sheath to tip,
and for R. amphibia and P. amphibia, only the leaf blade was
considered |
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
see above |
LeafWidth |
cm |
10 individuals (if available) of the target species were selected,
stored in separate bags and brought to the laboratory on the same day.
Width of the leaves was measured in the laboratory with centimeter precision
at half of the leaf length by folding flattened probes in half on graph paper.
|
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
see above |
CulmDiameter |
cm |
10 individuals (if available) of the target species were selected,
stored in separate bags and brought to the laboratory on the same day.
Culm diameter was measured in the laboratory with centimeter precision.
To avoid inaccuracy in culm diameters, the arithmetic mean of two
measurements were used for P. arundinacea, R. amphibia and P. amphibia.
For C. riparia, culm diameter was measured only once at the ground leaf
rosette in the field before the harvest.
|
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
see above |
TotalHeight |
cm |
10 individuals (if available) of the target species were selected,
stored in separate bags and brought to the laboratory on the same day.
Plant height was measured in the laboratory with centimeter precision
by flattening the probes on graph paper. Total plant height corresponds
to the distance between the cutting point and tip of the tallest leaf.
|
literature |
0.25x0.25 field plot mapping |
see above |
DM |
g |
All plant individuals of the target species were harvested from the plot area
confined by a wooden frame. Only individuals inside the frame considered, whereas
individuals rooting outside the frame were separated manually before clipping.
On the same day, the biomass was dried at 60°C for 48 h in drying chambers.
Then, the dry mass was weighed to the nearest 0.01 g with a laboratory scale. |
drying oven (Rumed Rubarth Apparate GmbH
and memmert GmbH & Co.KG) and scales (Kern EMB 200-2) |
biomass determination |
- |
DM_m2 |
g*m-2 |
Upscaling of plant biomass from target species to one square meter. |
- |
- |
- |